Important warning: There is a smear campaign by certain manufacturiers who have jumped onto the serrapeptase bandwagon and to save the high cost of enteric coating are saying that the phthalates used in enteric coating is the toxic the toxic type in plastics. Please be assured that this has been used on serrapeptase for over 30-years and is a totally safe type. Silver is a highly toxic element yet in its hydrosol form is healthy. This applies to the phthalates in enteric coating which is totally safe. These manufacturiers claim that their capsules make it through the stomach yet none of them have produced any video evidence to back up their claims.  Until then enteric coating has 30 years of proof.

Serrapeptase Cost Comparison of Brands per 80,000iu activity dose (see explanation below) Price comparison per dose is the only measure of value as activity is confusing.

Please note that I have used approximate retail prices for comparison and all the various suppliers will have special offers. Special offers will generally be matched by each supplier, but this will not change the comparison table below to a great extent.

Explanation:

To clear the confusion regarding milligram (mg) contents my recommendation is that it is better to ignore them completely and just look at the International Agreed Units of Activity (IU Activity). If it does not say IU on the bottle then it is not IU’s. You may see U or you may see SU. These are not IU and are considerably less potent than IU. IU has been used for Serrapeptase for over 30 years. U and SU is a new measure designed to confuse buyers much like the phone companies do with their price plans.